Why Is a Border Patrol Commander Lying Under Oath About Chicago Chaos?

Newly released court documents reveal Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino engaged in nearly seven hours of evasive, clipped, and downright deceitful testimony regarding his unit's disastrous Chicago mission. This isn't just a bureaucratic slip-up; it's a deliberate attempt to obscure accountability. Judge Sara L. Ellis didn't mince words, calling Bovino's statements "evasive" and suggesting he was "outright lying" about critical events, particularly the unprovoked tear gas deployment in Little Village.

The judge's scathing opinion, based on video evidence that directly contradicts the agency's narrative of a "violent mob," paints a disturbing picture. Instead of transparency, we saw government lawyers trading insults and attempting to shut down legitimate questioning. Bovino himself walked back his own initial statements about being struck by a rock, admitting he wasn't hit until after he unleashed chemical agents. This isn't leadership; it's an orchestrated cover-up.

From agents screaming obscenities to using AI for incident reports, the "Operation Midway Blitz" seems more like a textbook example of abuse of power and a colossal waste of taxpayer money. If federal law enforcement officials can't be trusted to tell the truth under oath about their actions, what hope do we have for justice? Are you okay with agents who deploy force without warning and then concoct false justifications, all while hiding behind legal trickery?